Primary contact method
Email placeholder until official inbox is finalized.
01 / Contact
Get in touch to collaborate.
All contact points below are planning channels. Once official channels are set, this page will carry direct links and forms.
02 / Channels
Where each kind of request goes.
Collaboration proposals
Use the structured partner form with scope, outcome, and timeline.
Volunteer pathway
Start with a three-week observation cycle and one simple service task.
Academic inquiries
We can arrange reading tracks and contextual dialogue sessions on request.
Technical requests
Ask for facilitation templates, review logs, or publication copies from public sessions.
Regional coordination
Proposals that include language support and local facilitation are considered first.
1. Introduce intent
State whether you are a learner, an organization, a researcher, or a volunteer.
2. Define scope
Share what you want to co-create and your expected contribution level.
3. Set a timeline
Offer preferred dates and an approximate timeline for review and pilot planning.
03 / Ways to take part
Choose how much to contribute.
The Association is open to thoughtful participation while it is being formally structured.
Observer
Join one pilot cycle, provide feedback, and learn by watching practical systems in use.
Contributor
Help with resources, facilitation support, or translation, and review one complete program cycle.
Facilitator
Co-lead sessions, maintain safety guidelines, and support feedback synthesis with the local team.
04 / FAQ
What people ask first.
Is the association officially registered now?
Not yet. This is an intentionally transparent pre-registration development stage, and we are publishing work and process publicly.
Can I participate if I am not in Nepal?
Yes. Onboarding can begin through remote pathways with orientation sessions and shared reflection templates.
Do you require spiritual certification to join?
No. We welcome reflective learners, practitioners, and collaborators while keeping content grounded and respectful.
How do you prevent over-expansion?
We prioritize pilot-first, review cycles, and explicit criteria before any larger rollout.
Who decides program direction?
The initial core team publishes proposals; participants and partners shape direction through documented feedback.
How long is each learning path?
It varies by track. We offer short, medium, and long loops so people can enter at an appropriate pace.
Can institutions partner with the project?
Yes. Institutions can partner at pilot, co-design, or advisory levels after a scope review call.
Are sessions free?
Many foundational paths are free while the structure remains in pilot mode; support-based contributions are clearly stated when needed.
How do you handle disagreements in interpretation?
Disagreements are reviewed through a documented feedback process with respectful listening and public revision notes.
Can I suggest a topic or reading theme?
Yes. We accept suggestions through the contact channel and review them against practical relevance and sequence.
A steady path, not a rushed one
Tell us your timezone, role, and what you want to build.
We keep building in sequence so every partner and participant can trust what has been done.